Application of chiral stationary phases for the separation of vitamin A acetate isomers.

The separation of vitamin A acetate isomers is essential for quality assurance of e.g. nutrition supplements, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical ingredients. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is currently the most suitable analytical method for tackling this challenging separation task. However, the existing methods based on normal phase chromatography (NPC) are poorly reproducible due to the typical disadvantages of NPC, such as long equilibration times and fluctuation in retention factors. A new reversed phase method developed in our labs allows the separation of the isomers applying a chiral stationary phase (CSP). This phase consists of an immobilized polysaccharide which can be used in every chromatographic mode. However, they are not typically used in reversed phase mode. Through the screening of various stationary phases with different polysaccharide based chiral selectors, the choice of the ideal stationary phase could be confirmed, allowing to draw conclusions about the retention mechanism. The CSP Chiralpak IG-3 was found to be the most suitable among the examined. Regarding the separation mechanism, the spatial helical structure of the polysaccharide derivatives was confirmed to be of particular significance. In addition to the stationary phase, the mobile phase was tested for optimization regarding composition, gradient parameters as well as temperature using chromatographic method optimization software for the sake of method robustness.

Selectivity optimization in liquid chromatography via stationary phase tuning.

In striving for the best possible separation, the selectivity of stationary phases as an optimization parameter is often underestimated although there are many ways to influence this powerful tool. This review serves to provide an insight into the various ways of adapting the selectivity of a separation in liquid chromatography. Approaches via temperature and flow rate tuning are discussed as a basis followed by focusing on the stationary phase as the superior optimization parameter. Highly selective stationary phases hereby provide an advantage for groups of similar analytes. For more complex mixtures, separations can be improved using mixed-mode technologies where different retention mechanisms are combined. Serial coupling, mixed-bed columns, and stationary phase optimized selectivity liquid chromatography provide solutions to various degrees. Finally, the advantages of stationary phase tuning over adaption of mobile phase and/or temperature are presented in terms of optimum application range.

Enrichment and quantification of 18 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from intermediates for plastics production by a generic liquid chromatography column switching.

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration in plastic products is regulated in (European Union) No. 1272/2013. However, this only covers the end products and not intermediate substances. Therefore, a generic method was developed to analyze the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons listed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the European Union. This method is based on direct large volume injection from solutions of plastic additives followed by liquid chromatography coupled to fluorescence detection. The additives Irganox 1010, ureido methacrylate, and cetyl methacrylate 1618F were used as examples for method development. Two serially coupled columns allowed the matrix to be removed on the first column and the analytes to be separated on the second column. The columns were connected by an intermediate valve. The valve allowed the matrix to be diverted after the first column and water to be dosed upstream of the second column via an additional pump. This allowed samples in aqueous or organic media to be focused at the column head. An injection volume of 100 µl and online aqueous dilution of 1:3 led to a limit of detection below 1 ng/ml for 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Moreover, concentrations between 1.6 and 10.3 ng/ml were found in the three plastic additives.

Performance in (Ultra-)high-performance liquid chromatography-How to qualify and optimize instruments in practice.

This paper investigates the suitability of an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/high-performance liquid chromatography hybrid system for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography applications. Thus, the effect of extra column band broadening, the gradient system, and the injection system were tested and optimized according to their capabilities. An increase of the theoretical plate number up to a factor of two is achieved by the optimization of the extra column volume into the typical ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography range (<10 µl). Moreover, for qualitative purposes injections of volumes typical for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography methods are precise. Despite this, a lack of precision and accuracy was determined for the gradient system, and the dwell volume meets the typical specification range for conventional HPLC systems. Therefore, hybrid systems are the intercept between both spectra and are limitedly suitable for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography applications. Another way to approximate ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography performance using a high-performance liquid chromatography system is superficially porous particles. Thus, H/u curves of 5 µm superficially porous and 3 µm fully porous particles were recorded in order to determine the effect of the particle technology resulting in comparable performance of the used stationary phases.